Chinese AI

Chinese AI Models You've Never Heard Of (That Beat GPT)

DeepSeek V3.2 won gold medals in IMO and IOI. MiniMax M2 scored 78% on SWE-bench. GLM-4.6 powers 30% of global AI usage. Discover the Chinese AI models beating Western giants at 10x lower cost.

Saket Poswal
Saket Poswal Author
4 min read
Chinese AI Models You've Never Heard Of (That Beat GPT)

Chinese AI Models You’ve Never Heard Of (That Beat GPT)

Pop Quiz: Which Model Won Gold Medals in IMO and IOI 2025?

Answer: Not GPT. Not Claude. Not Gemini.

DeepSeek V3.2 from China achieved the first-ever perfect scores in both International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) and International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI).

And you probably never heard of it.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: 30% of global AI usage comes from Chinese models, yet Western tech circles operate as if only OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google exist.

Let’s fix that.

The Three Giants You’re Missing

1. DeepSeek V3.2 - The Reasoning Champion

Achievements:

  • 🥇 IMO 2025: Gold medal (perfect score)
  • 🥇 IOI 2025: Gold medal (perfect score)
  • First AI to achieve perfect scores in both competitions
  • Reasoning capability rivals GPT-5.2

Cost: $0.30 input, $3 output per 1M tokens (10-20x cheaper than GPT)

Availability:

  • API access available
  • Open-source weights for self-hosting
  • No vendor lock-in

What this means:
DeepSeek disproves the “China = copycat” narrative. This is frontier innovation, not imitation.

2. MiniMax M2 - The Coding Powerhouse

Achievements:

  • đź“Š SWE-bench: 78% (beats Gemini 3 Pro at 76%!)
  • 2.3M downloads in first month (December 2025)
  • 230B parameters, 10B active (Mixture of Experts)
  • Open-source, self-hostable

Cost: $0.50 input, $3 output per 1M tokens

Why developers love it:

  • Best cost-performance for coding tasks
  • Can self-host (enterprises love this)
  • Active community, rapid improvements

Comparison:

  • GPT-5: $5/1M input → MiniMax: $0.50/1M (90% cheaper)
  • Quality difference: Minimal for coding tasks

3. GLM-4.6 - The Enterprise Standard (in Asia)

Achievements:

  • 200K context window
  • Near-parity with Claude Sonnet 4
  • Compliance: China data residency built-in
  • Enterprise favorite in China + Southeast Asia

Cost: $0.40 input, $2.50 output per 1M tokens

Why enterprises choose it:

  • Mandatory for China operations (data sovereignty)
  • Strong multimodal capabilities
  • Excellent long-context performance
  • Regulatory compliance baked in

Why You Haven’t Heard of Them

1. Language Barrier

Most announcements, documentation, and community discussions happen in Mandarin. Western tech Twitter misses 80% of developments.

2. Media Blind Spot

TechCrunch, The Verge, Ars Technica rarely cover Chinese AI (unless it’s fears/regulation). Actual technical achievements? Crickets.

3. Geopolitical Bias

“China AI = stolen tech” stereotype persists despite evidence. IMO/IOI gold medals can’t be copied—they require genuine innovation.

4. Ecosystem Fragmentation

Chinese models integrate less with Western tools (LangChain, etc.), creating adoption friction.

The 30% Reality

Global AI API usage breakdown (Q4 2025):

  • OpenAI (GPT): ~35%
  • Anthropic (Claude): ~15%
  • Google (Gemini): ~12%
  • Chinese models (DeepSeek, MiniMax, GLM, others): ~30%
  • Others: ~8%

30% is massive. Yet most Western developers act like it’s 0%.

Cost Comparison: The Real Differentiator

Scenario: Enterprise with 100M API calls/month

All GPT-5.2:

  • Average tokens: 50K input, 10K output per call
  • Monthly tokens: 5B input, 1B output
  • Cost: 5,000Ă—$5 + 1,000Ă—$25 = $50,000/month
  • Annual: $600,000

All MiniMax M2:

  • Same workload
  • Cost: 5,000Ă—$0.50 + 1,000Ă—$3 = $5,500/month
  • Annual: $66,000

Savings: $534,000/year (89% reduction)

For the same (or better) coding quality.

Should YOU Use Chinese AI Models?

âś… Use Them If:

1. Cost is a major concern

  • Bootstrapped startup
  • High-volume workloads
  • Tight budgets

2. Non-regulated data

  • Not healthcare (HIPAA)
  • Not finance (PCI-DSS in some regions)
  • No strict data residency requirements

3. Open to self-hosting

  • Can download weights
  • Run on your infrastructure
  • Complete data sovereignty

4. Operating in Asia

  • China: GLM mandatory for compliance
  • Southeast Asia: Chinese models increasingly dominant

❌ Avoid Them If:

1. Regulated industry (US/EU)

  • HIPAA compliance needed
  • GDPR with EU-only processing
  • Financial services with strict requirements

2. Geopolitical concerns

  • Defense contractors
  • Government agencies
  • Companies with China restrictions

3. Need widest ecosystem

  • LangChain, AutoGen, etc. have better Western model support
  • Documentation mostly English for GPT/Claude

The Smart Strategy: Multi-Vendor Orchestration

Don’t choose. Use all.

Route by task + requirements:

  • Coding (non-sensitive): MiniMax M2 (cost-performance king)
  • Reasoning (critical): DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-5.2
  • Long context (bulk): GLM-4.6 or Gemini 3
  • Regulated/ethical: Claude Opus 4.5
  • Ecosystem integrations: GPT-5.2

Result:

  • 40-60% cost reduction
  • Better task-specific quality
  • Vendor diversification
  • Geopolitical resilience

Learn the full orchestration approach

What This Means for 2026

1. The AI landscape is multipolar (not US-dominated)
Western + Chinese models both at frontier.

2. Cost arbitrage is massive
Enterprises ignoring Chinese models leave millions on table.

3. “Best model” is contextual
Best for what? For whom? With what constraints?

4. Orchestration is mandatory
No single vendor has all answers.

Further Reading

Data current as of December 21, 2025. Chinese AI model landscape evolving rapidly.

The question isn’t whether to use Chinese models. It’s whether you can afford NOT to.

Loading conversations...